Polarimetry Influenced by CCN and INP in Cyprus and Chile (PICNICC)


Joint project between
Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS) and University of Leipzig, Phase 1

TROPOS: Audrey Teisseire (PhD student) and Patric Seifert (PI)
University of Leipzig: Teresa Vogl (PhD student), Johannes Quaas (PI) and Heike Kalesse-Los (PI)

Abstract

PICNICC’s goal is to improve our understanding of aerosol effects on microphysical growth processes in mixed-phase clouds. Based on a combination of radar polarimetry, dual-frequency Doppler radar and lidar observations from a clean, pristine site in Punta Arenas (Chile, 53°S,71°W) and an aerosol-burden site in Limassol (Cyprus, 35°N,33°E ), the contrasts in the microphysical fingerprints of mixed-phase clouds, specifically of pristine ice formation, riming and aggregation, are studied. The investigations are supported by high-resolved numerical weather simulations using the ICON-NWP model with 2-moment microphysics, which are used to evaluate the impact of aerosol variations on cloud microphysics over the two field sites. Polarimetric, Doppler-capable radar forward operators, such as PAMTRA or CR-SIM, will be used to transfer the simulation results into observational space.

Our main hypothesis is, that the availability of ice nucleating particles (INP) drives the process by which ice grows in clouds in the temperature range between 0°C and -40°C, where liquid water can be present. When high concentrations of INPs are available, we expect clouds to glaciate at higher temperatures (Seifert et al., 2010; Kanitz et al., 2011), leading to aggregation being the dominant growth process. Opposed to this, if there is a scarcity in INP, liquid water layers will be more persistent. As a result, riming will occur more frequently than in high-INP conditions. Fig. 1 summarizes the proposed hypothesis in a schematic.


Figure 1: Schematic of the PICNICC hypothesis: Large concentrations in INP (mainly dust) lead to a higher ice fraction in clouds, thus promoting growth by aggregation. When INP concentrations are low, more supercooled liquid water will be present in the clouds, and riming will occur more frequently.




Status 2022

A new approach is elaborated using polarimetric variables from a scanning polarimetric cloud radar MIRA-35 in the 45° slanted linear depolarization (SLDR) configuration, to derive the vertical distribution of particle shape (VDPS) between top and base of mixed-phase cloud systems.The VDPS method aids one to characterize the shape of cloud particles from scanning SLDR-mode cloud radar observations (Teisseire et al., 2023). The approach combines modeled values of slanted depolarization ratio δs and cross correlation coefficient ρs from a scattering model (Myagkov et al., 2016) and measurements from SLDR scanning cloud radar. This method has the particularity to measure δs at minimum (90°, i.e.., zenith) and maximum (150°, i.e., 60° off-zenith) elevation angles only, θmin and θmax, respectively. The vertical distribution of particle shape is characterized by the polarizability ratio ξ (i.e., density-weighted aspect ratio). VDPS combined with spectral techniques (Kneifel et al., 2015, Kalesse et al., 2019, Radenz et al., 2019) represents a new way to differentiate riming and aggregation processes.

A description of the VDPS method was recently published as preprint in the special issue of PROM : https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2022-1431 (Teisseire et al., 2023). In this paper, VDPS is presented in more detail and is accompanied by means of three case studies describing prolate, isometric and oblate particles, measured in Limassol from the CyCare campaign in 2017. A new study is in preparation, aiming to differentiate aggregation from riming processes, which combines VDPS method (Teisseire et al., 2023) with cloud radar Doppler-spectral techniques VOODOO (Schimmel et al.,2022) and an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict riming (Vogl et al., 2022). Figure 1 represents an example of an aggregation case described by the vertical distribution of the polarizability ratio ξ. A positive gradient of ξ from the cloud top to the cloud bottom from oblate to isometric particles, is typical for aggregation processes. VOODOO doesn’t detect supercooled liquid droplets and particles become isometric at a temperature below 0°C . This configuration describes aggregation processes which produce aggregates, i.e. spherical particles.

Figure 1: Vertical distribution of the polarizability ratio on 26 August 2019 at 6:31 UTC, measured during the DACAPO-PESO campaign in Punta Arenas, Chile. This case study represents an example of aggregation processes.

The final revised paper “Using artificial neural networks to predict riming from Doppler cloud radar observations” (Vogl et al. 2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-365-2022) has also been published in the special issue of PROM. In this article, a method to infer riming using information extracted from cloud radar Doppler spectra is described. Different sets of artificial neural networks (ANNs) are trained using the “Biogenic Aerosols – Effects on Clouds and Climate” (BAECC) data set, which was acquired during winter 2014 in Finland. This data set contains both Ka- and W-band vertically-pointing cloud radar and in situ observations of snowfall collected by a Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP). The rime mass fraction (FRPIP) is retrieved from the PIP data, and the mean Doppler velocity (MDV), radar reflectivity (Ze), skewness and width of the spectra are extracted from the radar data, which are then spatio-temporally matched with the PIP data. The resulting training data set is used to train sets of ANNs which use different input variable combinations. The method is validated using the 19th March 2021 case observed at the Leipzig Institute for Meteorology (LIM) roof platform, for which ground-based observations by the video in situ snowfall sensor VISSS are available.

In Fig. 2, the radar reflectivity and mean Doppler velocity measured during the case are shown in the two panels on the left-hand side. A period of strong riming can be seen in the data around 14:40 to 14:50, where the MDV is smaller than -2 m/s. The two panels on the left-hand side show the ANN output, the upper panel is the unmasked product, the lower panel shows the result with masked regions of high eddy dissipation rate (EDR), which increases the spectrum width and can lead to wrong riming signals in the ANN output. The two examples of VISSS images shown in the two bottom panels match the ANN output very well, showing rimed particles during the time period when the ANN output indicates strong riming (14:40 - 14:50 UTC) and fluffy aggregates during the second selected time period (15:00 - 15:10 UTC), where the ANN output indicates no riming.

Figure 2: Left-hand panels: Radar moments measured during the case on 19 March 2021. (a) Radar reflectivity in dBZ (b) Mean Doppler Velocity. Right-hand panels: Riming during the case on 19 March 2021 as predicted by the ANN (top: unmasked, bottom: pixels with EDR above the threshold of 10−3 m2 s−3 are masked in gray). Bottom panels: images taken by the VISSS during the period from 14:40 to 14:50 UTC, and the period from 15:00 to 15:10 UTC.

One of the ANN configurations does not use the mean Doppler velocity (MDV) as input parameter, and can thus also be applied in orographic regions. This is especially relevant for the data acquired during the DACAPO-PESO field experiment, which is strongly influenced by gravity waves (Radenz et al., 2021). In the future, application of the novel method to the DACAPO-PESO data set and another data set acquired in Leipzig is planned, to contrast differences in riming occurrence between the two sites.

References

  • Kalesse, H., Vogl, T., Paduraru, C., and Luke, E.: Development and validation of a supervised machine learning radar Doppler spectra peak-finding algorithm, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 12, 4591–4617, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4591-2019, 2019.
  • Kneifel, S., von Lerber, A., Tiira, J., Moisseev, D., Kollias, P., and Leinonen, J.: Observed relations between snow fall microphysics and triple-frequency radar measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 6034–6055, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023156, 2015.
  • Myagkov, A., Seifert, P., Bauer-Pfundstein, M., and Wandinger, U.: Cloud radar with hybrid mode towards estimation of shape and orientation of ice crystals, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9, 469–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-469-2016, 2016.
  • Radenz, M., Bühl, J., Seifert, P., Griesche, H., and Engelmann, R.: peakTree: a framework for structure-preserving radar Doppler spectra analysis, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 12, 4813–4828, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4813-2019, 2019.
  • Radenz, M., Bühl, J., Seifert, P., Baars, H., Engelmann, R., Barja González, B., Mamouri, R.-E., Zamorano, F., and Ansmann, A.: Hemispheric contrasts in ice formation in stratiform mixed-phase clouds: disentangling the role of aerosol and dynamics with ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17969–17994, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17969-2021, 2021.
  • Schimmel, W., Kalesse-Los, H., Maahn, M., Vogl, T., Foth, A., Garfias, P. S., and Seifert, P.: Identifying cloud droplets beyond lidar attenuation from vertically pointing cloud radar observations using artificial neural networks, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 5343–5366, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5343-2022, 2022.270.
  • Teisseire, A., Seifert, P., Myagkov, A., Bühl, J., and Radenz, M.: Determination of the vertical distribution of in-cloud particle shape using SLDR mode 35-GHz scanning cloud radar, EGUsphere, 2023, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1431, 2023.
  • Vogl, T., Maahn, M., Kneifel, S., Schimmel, W., Moisseev, D., and Kalesse-Los, H.: Using artificial neural networks to predict riming from Doppler cloud radar observations, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 365–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-365-2022, 20.

Status summer 2021

Contribution of TROPOS

A new algorithm was implemented to determine the Vertical Distribution of Particle Shape (VDPS) in a cloud, using Range Height Indicator (RHI) scans from 90° (zenith pointing) to 150° elevation angle of the Slanted Linear Depolarization Ratio (SLDR) and the cross-correlation coefficient (ρcx),shown in Figure 1(b) and 1©, which are sensible to the shape and orientation of particles, respectively (Myagkov et al., 2016). From the elevation dependency of these two parameters and assuming that the hydrometeors are oriented horizontally along their long axis, the microphysical parameter polarizability ratio (i.e., density-weighted aspect ratio) can be derived as a function of height. A polarizability ratio ξ = 1 describes isometric particles (illustrated in Figure 1(e) with the dashed red line), while ξ < 1 and ξ > 1 describe oblate and prolate particles, respectively. The particularity of this new approach is the combination of a spheroid scattering model with polarimetric measurements. The new method was applied to data from two field campaigns (CyCARE in Limassol, Cyprus, and DACAPO-PESO in Punta Arenas, Chile, Radenz et al., 2021) and is prepared to run automatically. This vertical distribution of the particle shape in a cloud is a new way to understand processes like riming and aggregation, as either one of these processes in general contribute to a vertical change of microphysical properties.


Contribution of University of Leipzig

A novel machine-learning-based method to predict the rime fraction from features contained in cloud radar Doppler spectra has been successfully developed (Vogl et al., 2021, AMTD). Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were trained using data from the Finnish site Hyytiälä, where ground-based remote sensing instruments were collocated with in-situ sensors measuring snowfall. The ANN-based method, which uses the radar reflectivity, the spectrum skewness and the width of the spectra above the noise floor as input, was shown to be applicable for the Punta Arenas site. This method does not rely on the mean Doppler velocity (MDV), which is, in Punta Arenas, strongly influenced by orographic waves and thus cannot be used to detect riming. The successful development of this riming retrieval is an important prerequisite towards the objective of the project to distinguish between aggregation and riming. The next steps will be to apply the method to longer-term observations both for the Chilean (DACAPO-PESO, Punta Arenas) and the Cypriot (CyCARE, Limassol) sites and compare the results statistically. Furthermore, ICON simulations are being prepared and will be performed in the near future. The ICON model will be run using two nested grids (2.5 and 1.25 km horizontal resolution respectively), and the rime fractions of each hydrometeor type are computed (diagnostic variables). The meteogram output of selected points close to the measurement site will be used as input to the Passive and Active Microwave Transfer model PAMTRA (Mech et al., 2020).


Collaborative work

The developed approaches can be combined to obtain a better understanding of riming and aggregation processes. This is first done for selected case studies, and can in the future be extended to a statistical analysis. A selected case study is shown below to demonstrate the performance of the two newly developed techniques, and to present potential synergies of the two approaches. The case was observed on 2019-09-11 at Punta Arenas, Chile during the DACAPO-PESO field campaign (https://dacapo.tropos.de/).


Figure 1: Illustration of (a) the time-height plot of reflectivity measured by the W-Band radar at Punta Arenas, Chile, on 11 September 2019, RHI-scans at 3:30 UTC of (b) SLDR and © the cross-correlation coefficient, (d) the ANN-based riming retrieval, (e) the VDPS-based retrieval and (f) the height spectrogram of cloud radar Doppler spectra at 3:30 UTC.

Figure 1(a) shows the time-height plot of reflectivity measured by the W-Band radar in Punta Arenas between 1 :30 and 5:00 UTC. A high ice cloud merges with mid-level layer clouds, leading to precipitation (rain) between 2:45 and 4:30 UTC. The ANN-based riming retrieval (Figure 1(d)) predicts riming for the height range between approximately 3.5 and 5 km, between 2:45 and 3:30 UTC. The height spectrogram of cloud radar Doppler spectra for 3:30 UTC (Figure 1(f)) reveals that liquid water is present up to an altitude of 5 km, corroborating the prediction of the ANN. In Figure 1(b) and 1©, RHI-scans of SLDR and ρcx are performed with a SLDR-mode scanning cloud radar used during the campaign and show a vertical stratification of the cloud where different microphysical processes can occur. The vertical distribution of the polarizability ratio (Figure 1(e)), illustrates a stable layer of oblate particles from 5 to 8km (ξ < 1), where particles precipitate into the riming layer detected by ANN between 3.8 and 5km, due to the presence of supercooled liquid droplets, and becomes more and more spherical producing graupel particles from 2.5km to 3.8km (ξ = 1). The ANN is able to detect riming while the VDPS method allows us to observe graupel particles producing by riming processes. The combination of these two methods add important information for the differentiation of riming and aggregation processes.

References

  • Mech, M., Maahn, M., Kneifel, S., Ori, D., Orlandi, E., Kollias, P., Schemann, V., and Crewell, S., 2020. PAMTRA 1.0: The Passive and Active Microwave Radiative TRAnsfer Tool for Simulating Radiometer and Radar Measurements of the Cloudy Atmosphere, Geosci. Model Dev., 2020, 13, 4229-4251, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4229-2020.
  • Myagkov, A., Seifert, P., Bauer-Pfundstein, M., and Wandinger, U., 2016. Cloud radar with hybrid mode towards estimation of shape and orientation of ice crystals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 469–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-469-2016.
  • Radenz, M., Bühl, J., Seifert, P., Baars, H., Engelmann, R., Barja González, B., Mamouri, R.-E., Zamorano, F., and Ansmann, A., 2021. Hemispheric contrasts in ice formation in stratiform mixed-phase clouds: Disentangling the role of aerosol and dynamics with ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-360, in review.
  • Vogl, T., Maahn, M., Kneifel, S., Schimmel, W., Moisseev, D., and Kalesse-Los, H., 2021. Using artificial neural networks to predict riming from Doppler cloud radar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-137, in review..

Status 2020

The DACAPO-PESO field experiment (short for Dynamics, Aerosol, Cloud and Precipitation Observations in the Pristine Environment of the Southern Ocean) has started in December 2018 (Check out our blog! https://dacapo.tropos.de/). The campaign is a collaborative effort between TROPOS, University of Leipzig and the University of Magallanes, Punta Arenas. The installed instrumentation is the Leipzig Aerosol and Cloud Remote Observations System (LACROS) of TROPOS (Bühl et al., 2013), which comprises a 35-GHz cloud radar Mira-35, a multiwavelength-Raman-polarization lidar Polly-XT, Doppler lidar, microwave radiometer, disdrometer and radiation observations. A W-band radar from University of Leipzig was employed at the site, in addition, until September 25, 2019, meaning that almost 9 months of dual-wavelength observations are available. The operation of LACROS in Punta Arenas will be continued until April 2020.


Figure 1: Picture of the DACAPO-PESO site in Punta Arenas taken in August 2019. Photo credit: Martin Radenz



Contribution of University of Leipzig

● Cloud radar Doppler spectra
The detection of riming and aggregation processes is the first step required to analyze the differences in ice growth mechanisms between the two sites of Punta Arenas and Limassol. Cloud radar Doppler spectra contain useful information about the hydrometeor populations which are present in the radar observation volume. We want to take advantage of this connection to detect dominant microphysical ice growth processes. Especially riming can be evident from the cloud radar Doppler spectra: Supercooled liquid water droplets have fall velocities close to zero, while rimed particles fall at a considerable speed, which is significantly higher than e.g. for fluffy aggregates. Figure 2 shows an example for observed riming fingerprints in the radar reflecitivity (left panel) and the cloud radar Doppler spectra. The reflectivity time-height plot shows signatures of high-reflectivity “streaks” in higher cloud regions coinciding with the time of strongest precipitation. A range spectrogram plot at 14:22 UTC (top right panel) reveals a layer of supercooled liquid water (SLW) present (i.e. a mode with fall velocity around 0 m/s) between 2500 and 4000 m altitude. Below the SLW layer, the reflectivity increases. An example Doppler spectrum from 2800 m altitude reveals that two modes of ice particles are present in the same volume as the supercooled cloud droplets.


Figure 2: Example for riming signature evident in cloud radar Doppler spectra. The top left panel shows the radar reflectivity measured by the W-band radar on February 23, 2019 in Punta Arenas. In the top right panel, a range spectrogram at 14:22 UTC is plotted. The bottom panel shows Doppler spectra measured by the W-band (blue) and the Ka-band (red) at approximately the same time and range. Both spectra exhibit a narrow liquid water peak at around 0 m/s Doppler velocity.



● Cloud-resolving ICON modeling
The ICON model with the two-moments microphysics scheme, which was introduced by Seifert & Beheng (2006), is utilized to attribute observed differences in ice microphysical processes between the two sites. To make a comparison between modeled and measured clouds feasible, a forward operator is required. We are using the Passive and Active Microwave Transfer (PAMTRA) forward model (Mech et al., 2020; https://github.com/igmk/pamtra) to convert model output of one grid-box (the “meteogram” output for the location of Punta Arenas) to radar variables.


Figure 3: Left panel: Measured reflectivity (Ka-band) on June 11, 2019 in Punta Arenas. Right panel: Forward-simulated reflectivity at Ka-band using the PAMTRA forward model. The ICON model was run at 10 km horizontal grid resolution for this case.




Contribution of TROPOS

● SLDR-mode scanning cloud radar
Main instrument for the contribution of TROPOS to PICNICC is the 35-GHz cloud radar Mira-35 which was operated SLDR mode in both campaigns. This mode is implemented based on the setup of a conventional LDR-mode cloud radar, with the receiving plane rotated by 45 degrees with respect to the plane of transmission. In comparison to the standard linear depolarization ratio, slanted linear depolarization ratio is considerably less susceptible to variations in the orientation of hydrometeors, enabling the determination of the hydrometeor shape and orientation from range-height-indicator (RHI) scans (Myagkov et al., 2016). During both field campaigns, Mira-35 performed RHI scans from 90° to 30° elevation once per hour (at minute 30). During the remaining time, vertical-stare observations were performed to enable the characterization of the overall evolution of the atmosphere.

● Cloud microphysical fingerprinting from polarimetric parameters in SLDR mode
The combination of the gradient of both SLDR and cross correlation coefficient for elevations from 30° to 90° permits us to differentiate the main ice particle shapes, as is illustrated in Figure 4 below. Considering in addition the fall velocity of the particles yields to a refinement in the differentiation between spherically shaped aggregates and graupel.


Figure 4: Illustration of the relationship between SLDR and cross correlation coefficient (ρcx) and antenna elevation angle for different ice particle shapes (column, aggregate, graupel, dendrite).



From the hourly SLDR-mode RHI scans of MIRA-35, profiles of the shape and orientation of particles can be derived for detected cloud layers. Figure 5 represents a specific case of mixed-phase cloud observed in Punta Arenas on 4th September 2019. For example, for the given positive gradient in both SLDR and cross correlation coefficient with decreasing elevation (increasing distance) informs us about the presence of dendritic hydrometeors.



Figure 5: Observation of a mixed-phase cloud during an SLDR-mode RHI scan in Punta Arenas on 4 September 2019. (a) SLDR and (b) cross correlation coefficient.



From the long-term datasets of SLDR-mode RHI scans from Limassol and Punta Arenas, statistics of the vertical gradient of particle shape and orientation in the observed cloud layers will be studied and put into context with the overall atmospheric conditions as well as the aerosol load. Focus of the analysis will be put on the relationship of the microphysical evolution (i.e., the vertical gradient of shape and orientation) on aerosol conditions, with specific interest being put on distinguishing aggregation and graupel growth processes.

References

  • Bühl, J., Seifert, P, Wandinger, U., Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Schmidt, J., Myagkov, A., Engelmann, R., Skupin, A., Heese, B., Klepel, A., Althausen, D., Ansmann, A. (2013), LACROS: the Leipzig Aerosol and Cloud Remote Observations System, Proc. SPIE 8890, Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XVIII; and Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems XVI, 889002, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2030911.
  • Kanitz, T., Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Casiccia, C., and Rohwer, E. G. ( 2011), Contrasting the impact of aerosols at northern and southern midlatitudes on heterogeneous ice formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L17802, doi:10.1029/2011GL048532.
  • Mech, M., Maahn, M., Kneifel, S., Ori, D., Orlandi, E., Kollias, P., Schemann, V, Crewell, S. (2020), PAMTRA 1.0: A Passive and Active Microwave radiative TRAnsfer tool for simulating radiometer and radar measurements of the cloudy atmosphere, submitted.
  • Myagkov, A., Seifert, P., Bauer-Pfundstein, M., and Wandinger, U. (2016): Cloud radar with hybrid mode towards estimation of shape and orientation of ice crystals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 469–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-469-2016.
  • Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Mattis, I., Wandinger, U., Tesche, M., Engelmann, R., Müller, D., Pérez, C., and Haustein, K. ( 2010), Saharan dust and heterogeneous ice formation: Eleven years of cloud observations at a central European EARLINET site, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D20201, doi:10.1029/2009JD013222.
  • Seifert, A. & Beheng, K. D. (2006), A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45-66, 10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4.