Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| hidden:projects:icepolcka [2025/11/22 21:04] – ayush | hidden:projects:icepolcka [2025/12/16 15:10] (current) – kathrin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | The main reason are differences in rain drop size distributions. Based on the observed and simulated polarimetric radar signals (Fig 2), we conclude that in the convective core, FSBM and Morrison frequently lack large rain drops, while the two Thompson schemes and P3 simulate too many. In the stratiform region, on the other hand, only the P3 scheme produces a sufficient number of large rain drops, while all other schemes produce too few large rain drops, resulting in a low bias in radar reflectivity and differential reflectivity. | + | The main reason are differences in rain drop size distributions. Based on the observed and simulated polarimetric radar signals (Fig. 2), we conclude that in the convective core, FSBM and Morrison frequently lack large rain drops, while the two Thompson schemes and P3 simulate too many. In the stratiform region, on the other hand, only the P3 scheme produces a sufficient number of large rain drops, while all other schemes produce too few large rain drops, resulting in a low bias in radar reflectivity and differential reflectivity. |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| < | < | ||