Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| projects:imprint [2026/09/12 20:30] – ayush | projects:imprint [2026/09/12 20:44] (current) – ayush | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
| As a major objective of the project, we successfully collected novel high-quality radar datasets, where triple-frequency Doppler spectra are combined with spectral W-Band polarimetry covering a large variety of winter clouds. The first of the two proposed campaigns (second campaign was delayed due to COVID-19 and is currently planned for winter 2021/22) was successfully carried out from Nov. 2018 until Jan. 2019 at the Jülich ObservatorY forCloud Evolution Core Facility (JOYCE-CF, Löhnert et al. (2015); see also Fig. 1). The quality-controlled and post-processed dataset allowed to develop new approaches for radar calibration using polarimetric Doppler spectra (Myagkov et al., 2020) and for estimating total path attenuation and multi-frequency relative calibration (Tridon et al., 2020). A new triple-frequency retrieval of the rain PSD (Mróz et al., 2020) has been developed, which also allowed to better understand the link between rainfall and snow properties aloft (Mróz et al., 2021).\\ | As a major objective of the project, we successfully collected novel high-quality radar datasets, where triple-frequency Doppler spectra are combined with spectral W-Band polarimetry covering a large variety of winter clouds. The first of the two proposed campaigns (second campaign was delayed due to COVID-19 and is currently planned for winter 2021/22) was successfully carried out from Nov. 2018 until Jan. 2019 at the Jülich ObservatorY forCloud Evolution Core Facility (JOYCE-CF, Löhnert et al. (2015); see also Fig. 1). The quality-controlled and post-processed dataset allowed to develop new approaches for radar calibration using polarimetric Doppler spectra (Myagkov et al., 2020) and for estimating total path attenuation and multi-frequency relative calibration (Tridon et al., 2020). A new triple-frequency retrieval of the rain PSD (Mróz et al., 2020) has been developed, which also allowed to better understand the link between rainfall and snow properties aloft (Mróz et al., 2021).\\ | ||
| - | An impression of the rich information content of the new combined dataset is given in Fig. 1 which is also discussed in more detail in Trömel et al., 2021. The KDP indicates a steep increase in ice particle concentration below the -15°C temperature level which continues down to the surface (note that KDP at W-band is 10 times more sensitive than at X-band). The strongest | + | An impression of the rich information content of the new combined dataset is given in Fig. 1 which is also discussed in more detail in Trömel et al., 2021. The $K_\mathrm{DP}$ |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | <met figure |
| - | {{ fiqure_1_imprint_2021.png? | + | |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | |
| - | \\ | + | fit=" |
| - | \\ | + | title=" |
| + | caption=" | ||
| + | | ||
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| **Contribution of Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)**\\ | **Contribution of Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)**\\ | ||
| At DWD the main focus is to improve cloud and precipitation schemes in atmospheric models based on process fingerprints detectable in polarimetric observations. While bulk microphysical schemes often lack details because of generalizations, | At DWD the main focus is to improve cloud and precipitation schemes in atmospheric models based on process fingerprints detectable in polarimetric observations. While bulk microphysical schemes often lack details because of generalizations, | ||
| We extended McSnow to allow the natural development of ice habits by depositional growth and riming to eliminate mass to diameter relationships (at least for primary ice particles) and constrain the behavior by comparing the resulting particle shape to the large polarimetric signal typically caused by the asymmetry of ice crystals. Since the manifoldness of ice crystal shapes is sheer endless, we assume them to be oblate or prolate spheroids. Figure 2 shows the influence of the ice habit on the particle’s ice mass after 10 minutes of depositional growth at constant temperature and water saturation. The comparison with wind tunnel measurements (blue open squares, Takahashi et al. 1991) makes it apparent that the assumption of a spherical particle can greatly underestimate ice masses and illustrates the need for an explicit habit consideration to capture the temperature-dependent growth regimes. | We extended McSnow to allow the natural development of ice habits by depositional growth and riming to eliminate mass to diameter relationships (at least for primary ice particles) and constrain the behavior by comparing the resulting particle shape to the large polarimetric signal typically caused by the asymmetry of ice crystals. Since the manifoldness of ice crystal shapes is sheer endless, we assume them to be oblate or prolate spheroids. Figure 2 shows the influence of the ice habit on the particle’s ice mass after 10 minutes of depositional growth at constant temperature and water saturation. The comparison with wind tunnel measurements (blue open squares, Takahashi et al. 1991) makes it apparent that the assumption of a spherical particle can greatly underestimate ice masses and illustrates the need for an explicit habit consideration to capture the temperature-dependent growth regimes. | ||
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | <met figure |
| - | {{ fiqure_2_imprint_2021.png? | + | |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | width=" |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | title=" |
| - | The initial atmospheric conditions at nucleation showed to be of special importance for the further development of the particle since they crucially influence the particle’s shape and therefore mass and lifetime. Primary crystals that initially developed into a certain shape (pro- or oblate) tend to only rarely change their habit even in unfavorable atmospheric regimes. This effect results in a thermo- and hydrodynamical feedback that influence the mass and therefore the lifetime essentially.\\ | + | caption=" |
| + | | ||
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The initial atmospheric conditions at nucleation showed to be of special importance for the further development of the particle since they crucially influence the particle’s shape and therefore mass and lifetime. Primary crystals that initially developed into a certain shape (pro- or oblate) tend to only rarely change their habit even in unfavorable atmospheric regimes. This effect results in a thermo- and hydrodynamical feedback that influence the mass and therefore the lifetime essentially. | ||
| The coupling of McSnow and ICON is a crucial tool we are working with that helps to estimate the impact of the ice habit as well as the collision fragmentation in 2D/3D simulations. To better understand the impact, a recent parameterization of ice particle collisional fragmentation (Phillips et al., 2017) has been implemented into McSnow, complementing already included secondary ice processes, such as rime splintering. Only in real case setups the full spectrum of hydro- and thermodynamical feedbacks is present and therefore unveils the full impact. | The coupling of McSnow and ICON is a crucial tool we are working with that helps to estimate the impact of the ice habit as well as the collision fragmentation in 2D/3D simulations. To better understand the impact, a recent parameterization of ice particle collisional fragmentation (Phillips et al., 2017) has been implemented into McSnow, complementing already included secondary ice processes, such as rime splintering. Only in real case setups the full spectrum of hydro- and thermodynamical feedbacks is present and therefore unveils the full impact. | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 155: | Line 166: | ||
| **Collaborative work**\\ | **Collaborative work**\\ | ||
| - | To compare the habit-affected simulations with observations, | + | To compare the habit-affected simulations with observations, |
| - | {{ fiqure_3_imprint_2021.png? | + | |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | <met figure |
| + | src=" | ||
| + | width=" | ||
| + | fit=" | ||
| + | title=" | ||
| + | caption=" | ||
| + | caption-align=" | ||
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| - | In the last phase of IMPRINT, we now have all tools at hand to investigate specific microphysical processes by trying to reproduce common observational features, such as the rapid aggregation occurring at -15°C (see Fig. 1), with the new habit-dependent McSnow model. Our ongoing simulation studies strongly hint at secondary ice processes being highly relevant for explaining the observed radar signatures. In an upcoming cooperation with V. Phillips (Lund University) we plan to extend the parameterization for collisional fragmentation due to the addition of a dependency of the number of fragments released in every fragmentation on habits of the collision pair. | + | In the last phase of IMPRINT, we now have all tools at hand to investigate specific microphysical processes by trying to reproduce common observational features, such as the rapid aggregation occurring at $-15^\circ\mathrm{C}$ |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 190: | Line 208: | ||
| **Contribution of University of Cologne**\\ | **Contribution of University of Cologne**\\ | ||
| - | The contribution from the University of Cologne focuses on multi-frequency spectral Radar | + | The contribution from the University of Cologne focuses on multi-frequency spectral Radar polarimetric Observations and the polarimetric 1D radar forward operator. The first of two proposed winter campaigns (TRIPEx-pol) took place in Jülich from 1st Nov. 2018 until 19th Feb. 2019. During the campaign, vertically pointing X-Band, Ka-Band and W-Band Doppler radars as well as a scanning polarimetric W-Band radar were installed at the Jülich ObservatorY for Cloud Evolution – Core Facility (JOYCE-CF) (see Figure 1).\\ |
| - | polarimetric Observations and the polarimetric 1D radar forward operator. The first of two | + | |
| - | proposed winter campaigns (TRIPEx-pol) took place in Jülich from 1st Nov. 2018 until 19th | + | |
| - | Feb. 2019. During the campaign, vertically pointing X-Band, Ka-Band and W-Band Doppler | + | |
| - | radars as well as a scanning polarimetric W-Band radar were installed at the Jülich | + | |
| - | ObservatorY for Cloud Evolution – Core Facility (JOYCE-CF) (see Figure 1).\\ | + | |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | These measurements were complemented by the two polarimetric X-Band radars stationed in Bonn | + | These measurements were complemented by the two polarimetric X-Band radars stationed in Bonn and the Sophienhöhe and by 20 Radiosondes launched during the campaign. A first look at the dataset shows that the measurement setup is capable to capture ice microphysical processes: the polarimetric moment differential radar reflectivity |
| - | and the Sophienhöhe and by 20 Radiosondes launched during the campaign. A first look at | + | |
| - | the dataset shows that the measurement setup is capable to capture ice microphysical | + | |
| - | processes: the polarimetric moment differential radar reflectivity | + | |
| - | aggregation at around 14-16 UTC below 3000m (small values of ZDR), whereas the | + | |
| - | enhancement of the differential specific phase shift KDP in the same period indicates the | + | |
| - | presence of small, asymmetric particles. The spectral | + | |
| - | ratio DWR Ka-W allow to look at the smaller particles present (to which the moments of ZDR | + | |
| - | and Ze are insensitive as soon as larger particles dominate the signal). Looking at Figure 3, | + | |
| - | the spectral | + | |
| - | temperatures between -10 and -8°C. The Doppler spectra also show a widening just below | + | |
| - | -16°C, which might indicate secondary ice production at this height. Simultaneously, | + | |
| - | spectral | + | |
| - | consistently observed in the measurement volume down to the ground.\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | In order to get the most information from the available dataset, it is currently reprocessed | + | |
| - | and quality-controlled following the approach described in Dias Neto et al 2019. | + | |
| - | Furthermore, | + | |
| - | entire campaign. The multifrequency radar moments forward modeled with Pamtra such as | + | |
| - | the equivalent radar reflectivity factor Ze or the mean Doppler velocity show a good | + | |
| - | agreement with the observations and provide a good starting point for analysing the ice | + | |
| - | microphysics implemented in the model.\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | {{ imprint_figur1.png? | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| + | In order to get the most information from the available dataset, it is currently reprocessed and quality-controlled following the approach described in Dias Neto et al 2019. Furthermore, | ||
| - | {{ | + | <met figure |
| - | \\ | + | src=" |
| - | {{ | + | width=" |
| - | \\ | + | fit=" |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | title=" |
| - | \\ | + | caption=" |
| - | {{ | + | caption-align=" |
| - | \\ | + | load-animation=" |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | background=" |
| - | \\ | + | zoomable lightbox> |
| + | |||
| + | <met figure-grid | ||
| + | images=' | ||
| + | | ||
| + | {" | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | title=" | ||
| + | caption=" | ||
| + | caption-align=" | ||
| + | columns=" | ||
| + | layout=" | ||
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | background=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <met figure | ||
| + | src=" | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | title=" | ||
| + | caption=" | ||
| + | | ||
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | background=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| **Contribution of Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)**\\ | **Contribution of Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)**\\ | ||
| Line 240: | Line 255: | ||
| At DWD the main focus is to improve cloud and precipitation schemes in atmospheric models based on process fingerprints detectable in polarimetric observations. While bulk microphysical schemes often lack details because of generalizations, | At DWD the main focus is to improve cloud and precipitation schemes in atmospheric models based on process fingerprints detectable in polarimetric observations. While bulk microphysical schemes often lack details because of generalizations, | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | By extending McSnow to allow the natural development of ice habits by depositional growth and riming, we eliminate these relationships (at least for primary ice particles) and can constrain the behavior by comparing the particle shape to the large polarimetric signal typically caused by the asymmetry of ice crystals. Since the manifoldness of ice crystal shapes is sheer endless, we assume them to be oblate or prolate spheroids. Figure 4 shows the influence of the ice habit on the mass of a particle after 10 minutes | + | By extending McSnow to allow the natural development of ice habits by depositional growth and riming, we eliminate these relationships (at least for primary ice particles) and can constrain the behavior by comparing the particle shape to the large polarimetric signal typically caused by the asymmetry of ice crystals. Since the manifoldness of ice crystal shapes is sheer endless, we assume them to be oblate or prolate spheroids. Figure 4 shows the influence of the ice habit on the mass of a particle after $10\, |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | The initial conditions at nucleation are important for the development of the particle, since they crucially influence mass, shape, and lifetime. An example of the variability invoked by the ice habit is shown in Figure 5. Identical particles were nucleated every 5 meters | + | The initial conditions at nucleation are important for the development of the particle, since they crucially influence mass, shape, and lifetime. An example of the variability invoked by the ice habit is shown in Figure 5. Identical particles were nucleated every $5\, |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Further extensions to the model are habit specific riming that allows the formation of graupel from columns, and plates, a habit-specific aggregation process, as well as secondary ice production mechanisms like rime splintering and freezing fragmentation.\\ | Further extensions to the model are habit specific riming that allows the formation of graupel from columns, and plates, a habit-specific aggregation process, as well as secondary ice production mechanisms like rime splintering and freezing fragmentation.\\ | ||
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | {{ | + | <met figure |
| - | \\ | + | src=" |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | width=" |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | {{ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | caption=" |
| - | <WRAP tablewidth 60% center> | + | caption-align=" |
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | background=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <met figure | ||
| + | src=" | ||
| + | width=" | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | caption=" | ||
| + | caption-align=" | ||
| + | load-animation=" | ||
| + | background=" | ||
| + | zoomable lightbox> | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||